Brett King

Posts Tagged ‘P2P’

P2P a force to be reckoned with

In P2P Lending, Social Networking on December 14, 2011 at 09:28

No one could doubt that peer-to-peer lending (or P2P Lending) has landed big time in 2010, but it looks as if the best is just about to come.

The US leader Lending Club will issue more than $250 million in loans this year – greater than the last four years combined – for a total of nearly $450 million since inception.  Their last $100 million increment in their total loan portfolio growth came in just 4 months from the period July through November 2011.  Their returns have been stable throughout the market turmoil of the past few years – thanks in part to their focus on prime credit consumers – with an annualized default rate below 3%.

Prosper has seen 370% year-on-year growth in their business in 2011 lending over $70MM this year and bringing their total to more than $260m to-date , with a default rate of around 5.2%. Compared with BofA whose default on credit cards has been at an annualized basis of around 5.98% this year, down from a peak of 14.53% in August of 2009.

Zopa out of the UK has already lent more than £180 million (US$280m), which means they are now approaching a 2 per cent market share of the total UK retail lending market. The impressive thing about Zopa’s achievement is that their default rates are running at just 0.9%.

So who are lending from P2P lending networks?

If you believe the propaganda from the establishment, P2P lending is risky and only offers opportunistic financing to weak credit prospects – those that can’t get loans from traditional players. However, the reality is something entirely different.

The risk profile of P2P borrowers is often grossly overstated, and often the majority are healthy lenders simply looking for a better deal. That’s why P2P defaults are often as good as, if not better than, the majors.

“We can offer low rates in comparison to our banking competitors in part because we focus only on a select subset of customers — the most credit worthy borrowers — and our fair pricing is commensurate with their risk.”
Renaud Laplanche, CEO, Lending Club

The P2P lenders have also done considerable work on understanding the behavior of lenders, thus they don’t look just at the credit score (a lagging indicator of a default risk), but also at the future likelihood of a default.

“I think our low defaults aren’t just because of P2P but because we built a better credit model, taking more account of over-indebtedness and affordability than banks”
Giles Andrews, CEO, Zopa

These better models are helping P2P to thrive.

Tis’ the season for P2P Lending

There are times like Thanksgiving week in the US where P2P Lending is predictably slower than normal, but there are also times when P2P faces natural growth in demand.

“We’re gearing up for 50% increase in lending in January 2012, now that we’ve proven the viability of our business model.”
Giles Andrews, CEO, Zopa

I met with Scott Sanborn, the Chief Marketing Officer for Lending Club earlier in the year in San Francisco, but I got together with him via phone last week and asked him if there was seasonality to their lender’s behavior.

“We’ve always got a pop in January. Primarily because approximately two thirds of our loans historically are used to settle credit card debt.”
Scott Sanborn, CMO, Lending Club

Last week the Federal Reserve released its latest G19 report on consumer credit. Revolving consumer credit increased marginally (0.5%) for the first time in September of this year, and that trend has continued in October. Revolving credit card has been on the steady decline since 2008, down from a peak of $972Bn to a low of $790Bn in August of 2011. In 2009, that meant that every month saw a decline of close to $10Bn in revolving credit in the US. That trend has changed course in the second half of 2011 as borrowers return tentatively to credit facilities.

Revolving Credit has been on the decline since 2008, but this Christmas is set to rise again

Historically, December and January credit card debt always tends to shoot up due to Christmas shopping habits. Online lending around the end of the year has also been steadily increasing due to the primacy of the online channel, so it’s no surprise that as P2P awareness improves that P2P lending is set to rise this Christmas season too. The difference this Christmas, compared with the last 3 years, is that with revolving credit flattening out the spike in January is stacking up to be the biggest in P2P’s short history.

P2P – Maturing or Mature?

The other difference (in the US particularly) is that we’re seeing more sophisticated investors participating in P2P transactions, meaning that there will be an abundance of cash to support the demand for P2P credit. In fact, the major P2P players in the US are seeing institutional investors, high-net worth investors and the like looking to put cash into P2P. Not just to get a higher deposit rate, but to get that rate with only marginally greater risk – if at all.

Players like Zopa, Lending Club and Prosper are anticipating their largest January yet. In fact, this season is likely to be larger than the 2008-2010 lending seasons put together for the P2P market. If anyone had any remaining doubts about the viability of P2P lending, then I think we can put that to bed this season.

As the song goes… “It’s beginning to look a lot like Christmas!”

Advertisements

Will the US be last in the drive towards a cashless society?

In Economics, Future of Banking, Mobile Payments on September 1, 2011 at 23:50

Although it is a long-time off yet, we can now envisage a time when most of the developed world, and indeed most of the developing world will no longer deal in hard currency. There are a number of drivers for this:

1. Impact of mobile payments
2. Tighter money laundering requirements, and
3. Cost of physical handling versus electronic transactions

Since the mid-20th century many have heralded the impending cashless society, but it may be that the emergence of mobile payments is the final tipping point in that outcome. Indeed, empirical evidence is already available that cash is in serious, if not terminal decline.

Strong incentives

For years regulators and governments have worked to track the movement of physical currency across border, and in the case of terrorist financing and criminal activities. The Financial Action Task Force developed 40 core recommendations in 1990 (revised in 1996) designed to reduce the risk of money laundering, but the greater part of the effort was focused on the movement of hard currency and it’s role in criminal undertakings. The reason for this is that it is harder to track currency, and if it can move freely around the system, the criminals, terrorists and “evil doers” can support their activities without restraint.

The strongest case for the removal of cash is around criminal activities. David Warwick posted an excellent review of the issues around cash and it’s active involvement in crime in a recent post entitled “The Case Against Cash”. In it he cites the following facts:

“Now consider that low-level drug offenses comprise 80% of the rise in the federal prison population since 1985 (though those numbers have begun to go down in more recent years)…The vast majority of those illegal transactions are cash-based. Greenbacks are also the currency of choice for Mexican drug cartels, which funnel between $19 billion and $29 billion in profits out of the United States annually, according to the U.S. government.”
David Warwick, CBS Interactive Business Network, Aug 2011

The biggest costs and risks are in cash

In recent times in places like the Netherlands, the cashless society has already started to become a reality. In 2010, the Amsterdam City Government moved to create ‘cashless’ zones in the De Pijp and Nieuw-West (New West) districts as a result of rising crime rates. You can now only use Chip and Pin to pay in those locations. This has been successful enough that it is now being rolled out across other districts in Amsterdam.

In Ireland, Belgium, Netherlands and other locations, banks are increasingly going cashless to reduce costs and crime. In recent years banks like SNS Bank in Utrecht and National Irish Bank, were two such European banks to commence the move to Cashless. Both cited the rising costs and risks of dealing with physical cash, and low volume of real ‘cash transactions’ in-branch, as a metric for justifying the move.

Emerging economies may be first

In the Philippines, Kenya, Somaliland, Nigeria, Senegal, India and other such locations, the success of mobile payments and remittances is starting to see a dramatic shift in the day-to-day operation of the economy. In Somaliland where there are no ATMS, and almost no banking infrastructure, mobile payments enabled by mobile operators, the hawalad and money changers, might mean this province could become one of the first cashless societies.

The key to moving away from cash, is reducing the reliance on cash day-to-day. RBA Governor Malcom Edy noted that cash use in Australia had declined from 40% down to 30% of traditional ‘retail’ payments. In the UK, cash usage is also in decline, with the UK Payments Council estimating that it will represent just 0.8% of retail payments by 2018 (this is down from 90% in 1999). In both cases, the use of Debit Cards has been cited as the contributing factor.

In Rural India, Sub-Saharan Africa and the Philippines mobile payments are booming

It’s all about behavioral shift in payments

The shift towards cashless requires reducing momentum in the ‘cash system’ by shifting to alternative modes of payment. The Debit Card has been an obvious ‘cash-killer’ in places like the UK and Australia, whereas mobile payments have had a much more rapid and profound effect on emerging economies. So with Peer-to-Peer (P2P) mobile and internet-based payments rapidly accelerating, and the move to NFC payments – the likelihood of ‘saving’ cash from terminal decline looks less and less likely. Check out PayPal’s P2P solution using NFC enabled Android phones for example.

In this regard, the EU with it’s strong support for debit cards, chip and PIN and increasing mobile enablement, and the emerging economies of Africa and Asia with both low friction against cash and the pressing need for financial inclusion, probably mean that the US, who is so strongly and emotively married to the ‘greenback’ and stuck with outmoded mag-stripe will likely be among the last to go largely cashless sometime in the next decade.

The momentum for these changes are building and it is a longer-term trend that will change the way we view banks and money in the very near future. The more friction you have, the more consumers will find workarounds. At the end of the day, a mobile or P2P payment will have far less friction than a cash payment.

The Total Disruption of Bank Distribution – Part 3

In Bank Innovation, Customer Experience, Future of Banking, Technology Innovation on July 12, 2011 at 07:37

Massive spend on innovation at the front-end of retail financial services

Putting aside conjecture of whether or not we are in a bubble at the moment around tech, social media, and mobile services (which I believe we very well could be), the reality is we are seeing a flurry of massive investment in new distribution models and organizations acting as either technology or behavioral enablers. We’re used to seeing big numbers for M&A activity in banking, but we’re not used to seeing such a flood of start-ups and non-traditional competitors facing off against traditional players at the retail side of the business.

In just the last 3 years there has been more than $7Bn in private equity, venture capital and private investment made into non-traditional financial services start-ups that challenge existing models. This is the first time globally that there has been this scale of challenge to the traditional retail financial services space from start-ups in the technology arena. To illustrate the level of activity, here are just a few recent investments in the New York fintech space alone (source: Quora):

SecondMarket ($15mm)– marketplace for illiquid financial instruments; secondmarket.com
Kapitall ($7.3mm)– discount brokerage with gaming elements; kapitall.com
Betterment ($3mm)– online brokerage for small investors; betterment.com
Plastyc ($2mm)– mobile based banking for the underbanked; plastyc.com
AxialMarket ($2mm)-
online middle market i-bank; axialmarket.com
BankSimple ($3mm)- online/mobile banking interface; banksimple.com
Covestor ($11mm)- platform to find SMA providers and invest with amateur traders; covestor.com
Hedgeable next generation investment management firm; hedgeable.com

However, in addition to these plays you have very some serious initiatives now doing major business in the space that used to be considered the sole domain of ‘banks’. Here are four examples:

Personal Financial Management

Mint was acquired by Intuit in September of 2009 for $170m. Mint has experienced meteoric growth in customer base. Today Mint has more than 5m customers willingly giving their personal financial data, bank account and spending information to receive the benefits of fine tuned recommendations for financial services investments and credit products.

Businesses like SmartyPig, which has a collaborative play with the industry, are very successful at stimulating simple behaviors like savings for specific goals. SmartyPig has raised over $1.2Bn in deposits for the partners banks it works with such as Citi, West Bank, BBVA, ANZ, etc. They utilize social media to encourage your friends and family to assist you in your savings goals. For example, my kids were able to use SmartyPig to solicit assistance from their grandparents, uncles, aunties, etc to help with their savings goal.

Admittedly, we also seen Blippy and Wesabe crash and burn in recent times. However, the readiness of the investment community to experiment in the space of services that are complimentary or competing directly with traditional FIs is clearly increasing.

P2P Lending

Lending Club, Prosper and Zopa are just three examples of recent successes in the P2P lending space. Lending Club is lending around $20m a month in loans, and have lent more than $300m, with an average loan size around US$10,000. In France, FriendsClear has recently announced that Crédit Agricole will be joining their efforts in a collaboration of sorts; exactly how this will work is still under wraps.

Zopa has lent more than £150m which means they are now approaching a 2% market share of the total UK retail lending market. Zopa’s average loan size is around GBP 5,000, but what is more significant is their Non-Performing Loans (NPL) ratio. Major U.K. banks typically recorded NPL ratios in the 2%-3% range from the mid-1990s through to 2007, but by the end of 2009 Lloyd TSB’s gross NPL was as up to 8.9% and HSBC’s hovering around 3% (source: Standard and Poors). So how did Zopa perform in this environment? Zopa’s NPL ratio sits at around .9%. That’s 10% of Lloyds and 1/3rd of the best bank in the UK HSBC!

Zopa's NPL Ratio is 10% that of Lloyds TSB in the UK

So how is it that a social network that lends money between its participants is better at managing loan risk than banks that have been at this for hundreds of years?

The key here is the positive psychology of social networks versus banks. If I lend money off a bank and I’m having difficulty paying that back due to loss of income, or just having a hard time making ends meet, I’m likely to let the loan slip and wait for the bank to chase me. P2P networks like Zopa, on the other hand, are finding customers proactively contacting them to make payment arrangements when they can’t meet their monthly commitment. Why?

Firstly, there are people at the end of the loan – not a big bad bank who “can afford the loss”. Secondly, the fact that there are people at the end of the loan versus a bank means that people are more inclined to prioritize paying back their loan to other people, over that of a large institution. This positive peer pressure is producing astounding results. I also asked Giles Andrews from Zopa about why he thought Zopa was better at managing lending risk than banks…

“I think our low defaults aren’t just because of P2P but because we built a better credit model, taking more account of over-indebtedness and affordability than banks”
Giles Andrews, CEO, Zopa.co.uk

Who would have thought that social networks would be better, safer, and more efficient at lending than retail banks?

In fact, P2P lending has been so successful that in recent times both Umpqua Bank and Fidor Bank (a start-up online, direct bank in Germany) have incorporated some P2P as a component of their bank platforms. Why take all the risk yourself as a bank, when some customers are willing to cover the risk themselves? But don’t think that P2P is just easy money. Wall Street Journal reported in June of this year that 90% of Lending Club’s applications were refused.

Maybe that’s why P2P is good business – because they actually take fewer risks than banks?

Pre-paid debit cards, E-Money Licenses and Payments

Amex, Greendot, NetSpend and Walmart are just three organizations that have recently made big pushes into the prepaid debit card arena in the US alone. Significantly, the US now has 40-60 million underbanked consumers (source: FDIC, Financial Times), half of whom have college degrees, and 25% of whom are prime credit rated. Many of these are opting out of the traditional banking system, but carry a pre-paid debit card. The pre-paid debit card industry will account for more than $200 Billion in funds by the end of 2011 along (source: Packaged Facts).

Top 5 reasons people get a prepaid Debit Card

The financial crisis has accelerated the increase in those whom no longer participate in the formal banking system. Since the financial crisis 60% of new mobile phone users in the United States have been no-contract, pre-paid phone users.

“As an economy becomes richer and incomes rise, the normal expectation is that the proportion of the unbanked population falls and does not rise as is now happening in the United States…”
Washington Post, December, 2009

Combined with increased account fees from big banks recently affected by reduction in interchange revenue, and modality changes, I think we can expect that increasingly customers who don’t need complex banking relationships will opt out of the banking system by using prepaid debit cards and in the future prepaid wallets enabled via NFC and mobile Apps.

In the UK Google, O2, BT and others are looking seriously at the combination of prepaid debit cards type functionality into a wallet. Google already launched their Google Wallet earlier this year, and we can only see more and more of this action in the coming months.

The raft of P2P payments, mobile payments and mobile enablement are bewildering at the moment. Undoubtedly, we’ll see many variations of mobile payments in the near future. With PayPal predicting $3 Billion in mobile payments in 2011 alone, the future of mobile-based prepaid debit cards looks very healthy.

Conclusions

We’ve never had such a concerted, technology-led explosion of retail financial services solutions that are directly in competition with the traditional players in the space. While some of these initiatives are complementary, increasingly we’re seeing startups that realize you don’t need a banking license to play on the fringes of the banking system. When you only know one way of running your business you will be increasingly challenged by customers who don’t relate to the questions you ask, the processes you have in place, and the insistance on using outdated physical artifacts and networks.

This is the first time we’ve seen a global attempt at reinventing the way banking fits into our lives on a day-to-day basis, and it is bound to create massive friction for a sector known to be very attached to traditional modes and models. One thing is clear, increasingly banks will be competing with new businesses that are faster, better, more relevant and aggressive than the long-held bastions of traditional savings and loans.

These businesses will embrace and exploit changing modality. These businesses will love disruptive customer behavior, they’ll encourage it!

Mobile Payments: More than P2P and NFC…

In Customer Experience, Mobile Payments on June 29, 2011 at 10:37

Today I’ve been in Beetsterzwaag, Opsterland, Netherlands, about 150 kilometers from Amsterdam at an offsite strategic retreat with the ICS (International Card Services) team. Initially part of Bank of America’s presence in the Netherlands, ICS today is an independent subsidiary of ABN Amro NV, but works in the provision of a range of card services around issuance, promotion, processing and so forth. ICS has around 3 million customers today, and the session we had was around the implications of mobile payments in the form of NFC, P2P and other initiatives such as cardless loyalty program implementations.

What emerged was a very interesting realization in respect to opportunities in the mobile payments ecosystem that hadn’t fully occurred to me until this planning session.

More than just a payment

While I’ve often discussed the contextuality of payments and the massive opportunities that companies like Google are trying to leverage in respect to messaging around payments (before, during and after the payment event), it is interesting to think about different payment executions. We need responsible partners in the ecosystem to start handling not just straight through payments, but multiple variations on a theme, understanding the various parties and implied contracts involved.

P2P Direct or Merchant one-off payment

The simplest payment journey to conceptualize is when you walk into a retail store and pay a merchant according to the cost of the purchase, or when you have a service event where you simply take your NFC phone and execute a live person-to-person payment. Today you can already use PayPal Bump to execute a live phone to phone or person-to-person payment, but in the future, I’ll just put my phone into send or receive mode for an NFC payment and the respective individual’s wallet will do the rest (discounting all the back-end complexities, of course).

PayPal is slated to do $3.1 Billion in Mobile Payments in 2011

This is a fairly simple execution – take a payment from one person, send to another via either NFC, bump or a wallet. We can use location services, authentication and NFC to simplify and secure the phone to phone interaction, or we can use an App like PayPal to transfer to a unique individual via their phone number, email address or similar. The ability to split payments amongst a number of individuals, such as paying for a bill at a restaurant would also fall into this category.

The value here is the simple execution of a person-to-person transfer without requiring adherence to the current bank-led wire transfer or ACH equivalent which requires a routing number, an account code, the bank address, etc, etc. The opportunity for NFC phone to an NFC POS or another NFC phone is also obvious.

The credit facility or installment plan

Another powerful in-store implementation will be the ability to offer a real-time credit facility to back a payment. It might be a line of credit, a personal loan facility or a 12-month, low-interest payment plan with regular monthly payments. The ability to offer you real-time finance options that are more competitive than using a competitors hefty credit card APR program is pretty compelling at the point-of-sale, and can steal you away at the most critical moment – when you are about to pay for a big ticket item.

Mobile offers payments providers this sort of contextual opportunity, which currently is too difficult or erroneous to do with a plastic card and traditional advertising offers. Give me an offer in-store and help me execute the line of credit in real-time. Powerful enough to get me to change payment partners right in the midst of a transaction.

The Contract Payment

In this scenario we may have an upfront payment, but the full transaction is only effected with completed, successful delivery of the required goods or services. In business we have constructs like an LOC (Letter of Credit) which facilitates such payment contracts, but in the individual merchant/service provider and consumer space, these sorts of payments contracts are implied and managed informally. However, there may be an opportunity for this to be managed in an semi-automated fashion through the payments ecosystem.

Whether it is time based for hurdle payments to occur as specific milestones are reached, when physical goods are delivered, or when a contracted service is rendered – there is an opportunity to simplify the payments journey by authorizing the subsequent payments via a mobile device or online.

Facilitating the platform

As we move increasingly to person-to-person electronic payments, the ability not only to execute an individual one-off payment, but also variations on a theme with either a payment agreement/plan or a underlying credit facility adds value to the P2P ecosystem.

Today we have the likes of PayPal working on P2P, individual merchants offering some payment facilities, but we don’t have an emerging player combining these different capabilities and relationships to create journeys supported by a range of more flexible, automated payment variations.

When you mix analytics, always on IP layer or the cloud, a mobile device, location and the ability to offer a variety of payment mechanisms, the future of payment journeys looks very, very interesting. Payment journeys offer massive opportunities for reinventing and simplifying the way we currently interact in this space.

The coming clash of regulators and P2P via mobile

In Customer Experience, Mobile Payments on May 30, 2011 at 08:52

When the commercial internet became popularized in the mid-90s the emergence of e-Commerce quickly led to some amazing new business models, and inevitably the hype of the dot com bubble. While much of the dot com ‘crash’ survived and thrived (e.g. Google, Yahoo, Amazon) there were those that appeared happy to proclaim that the fad of the internet was over. Of course it wasn’t over, it was only just beginning.

Ironically, the impact of those new business models and new ‘paradigms’ that emerged in the late 90s are still being felt today. The collapse of Borders recently, can be traced back to the emergence of the online book store as a category. In the midst of the dot com bubble, Borders abandoned it’s web presence and sold out to Amazon who took over the site because web was perceived as ‘unprofitable’. Within just 6 years Borders.com was delivering $160 million in annual revenues for Amazon. At this stage, Borders scrambled to break its ties with Amazon, but they never quite appeared to get on top of the new distribution model as evidenced by their recent chapter 11 status. The clear misunderstanding of the role of the channel, along with a weak multi-channel distribution commitment from the get go, is symptomatic of a more fundamental problem – the business wasn’t able to make the shift away from reliance on their traditional store-based approach to book sales because it was too ingrained.

Blockbuster, Encyclopedia Britannica, Travel Agencies, Stock Brokers and others have faced similar challenges over the last decade.

What does all this have to do with mobile payments and KYC?
Clearly we are entering a phase of massive disruption to the payments system(s) and incumbents of today. To put that disruption in perspective, let’s think about what has led up to the current slew of mobile payments announcements and improvements.

PayPal evolves P2P
PayPal commenced business in its current form around March 2000 with the merger between Peter Thiel’s Confinity and Elon Musk’s X.com. PayPal’s initial business was focused on enabling payments for EBay’s platform. eBay had purchased Billpoint in March of 1999 to provide this functionality, but by Feb 2000 PayPal was handling 200,000 daily auctions and payments, compared with only 4,000 a day for Billpoint.

Today PayPal handles $62Bn in transactions. That’s growing at an incredible rate of 25% annually too, primarily thanks to mobile payments.

Banks didn’t
Although it is patently obvious that person-to-person payments is a huge business and has been growing incredibly online since the late 90s, today the current bank-based P2P system is incredibly archaic and unwieldy for most banks and consumers. Why have incumbents clung on to the traditional ACH, Wire and Cheque-based payment systems in the face of such rapid growth in online payments? You’ll hear two arguments largely. The first being that P2P represented, up until recently, such a small part of the overall payments traffic that it was incidental and there wasn’t a business case of reforming the payments space. The second is that there is an incredible amount of inertia around the current system, and changing that takes perseverance, effort, investment and considerable re-engineering. That effort and investment was unlikely to come until it was absolutely necessary – of which it obviously is today.

Now, 11 years after PayPal’s foray into P2P we have the first broad financial institution focused effort, namely ClearXchange. Of course, we’ve seen CashEdge, PNC Virtual Wallet, and others have a shot at this, but none of the big banks have got behind the prospect of P2P until now. The fact that it has taken a decade is evidence of the same internalized thinking and inertia problems Borders faced in respect to changing distribution models and modality.

Emerging markets go Mobile
M-PESA has already launched in Kenya, Tanzania, Afghanistan and South Africa with well over 13 million customers. G-Cash and SMART in the Philippines are processing more than $500m in mobile payments each year, and that is rapidly growing. It’s estimated that by 2016, total mobile money transactions will reach $126 billion, with Southeast Asia accounting for $30.1 billion.

The key to understanding emerging markets growth has been the high penetration/adoption of mobile phones and the need for financial inclusion of the large swathes of population in the unbanked category. However, clearly the momentum around mobile smartphone adoption in developed markets, the rapid decline in use of cheques, and the massive competition from operators and handset manufacturers is now forcing the hand of the traditionals in the payments space.

Current KYC regs are a poor fit with where P2P and Mobile Payments is going

The End Game – a problem for Compliance and KYC
The end game clearly is that you should be able to send anyone with a mobile phone, an email address, a Facebook account or Twitter ID money from anywhere in the world. This solves two existing, intractable problems. The unwieldy and needlessly complex system around current wire transfers, TTs, etc and the need to have a bank account with the right receiving bank before you can receive money.

The problem with both issues is the current regulatory environment and bank policy around KYC, AML prevention and security. The more banks insist on complex KYC before you can open an account, the greater the risk is that I’ll circumvent the system because of its complexity. Now I can hear arguments defending such regulation and legal requirements already, but the problem is that the current system is complex because we need to confirm the identity of both parties in a transaction. This is a question of identity, not KYC process.

In December of 2009, my pal Dave Birch articulated a very clear position on why the current KYC regimen can not survive the mobile payments revolution.

“I wasn’t not arguing that we should have no KYC checks, but what I was arguing for was a sensible floor below which KYC checks are not needed. I happened to be in a local branch of national financial services organisation a few weeks ago when, for dreary reasons, I had to get into a queue. The person in front of me in the queue was trying to send fifty pounds to a relative in Liverpool. The clerk told him that couldn’t, because he didn’t have a passport and a utility bill. The chap complained that he had been sending this birthday money every year for decades. The clerk was unmoved. So who benefits from this?”
Dave Birch, Digital Money Blog

To make P2P payments really work, you have to be able to send anyone money at anytime. The current KYC and AML regulations don’t really make sense for day-to-day transactions under say US$1,000 or Dave’s proposed €500. PayPal has been a reasonably elegant solution to this in the short-term, but a long-term solution means if banks want to play in the day-to-day P2P space, they have to push back on stupid KYC rules… and so do we as customers.